The Case for Behaviour Change — Now

When Households Hurt,
Incentives Work Harder

Australia's cost-of-living crisis is not history — it is right now, worsening in 2026, and creating the most financially motivated population in a generation. That's the single greatest opportunity to drive mass recycling behaviour change. Here's the evidence.

4.75%

RBA cash rate forecast by end of 2026

18-year high if 2 more hikes land

MacroBusiness / Roy Morgan, Apr 2026

30.9%

of mortgage holders 'at risk' of stress

Forecast to hit 18-yr high in 2026

Roy Morgan Research, Mar 2026

70%

of Australians facing housing stress

Compounding since mid-2022

Yahoo Finance / ABS, 2026

4.2%

living cost rise for age pensioners

Dec 2025 quarter — highest of all groups

ABS Living Cost Indexes, Feb 2026

-0.7%

real household income per person

Falling in H1 2026 — AFR

NAB Economists via AFR, Apr 2026

52%

National CDS return rate plateau

Despite years of awareness campaigns

CDS Scheme Operators

Section 1 — The Financial Reality

Australia Is Under Financial Siege

Years of compounding cost-of-living pressure have left Australia's households in their most financially vulnerable position in a generation. As of 2026, the RBA is forecast to deliver further rate hikes — potentially pushing the cash rate to an 18-year high. Living costs rose for every household type through 2025. Real household income per person is falling in 2026. These aren't projections — they are the documented reality Australian families are navigating right now.

"Living standards are set to slide in the first half of 2026 — real household income per person forecast to fall 0.7%."

This isn't historical — this is now. Years of compounding cost-of-living pressure, record housing unaffordability, and rising living costs across every household type have created the most financially stressed Australian population in a generation. The RBA is expected to deliver further rate hikes in 2026, with markets pricing a cash rate of 4.75% by year end — an 18-year high.

When household finances are under this kind of sustained pressure, every legitimate financial opportunity matters more. That is the environment the 10c Recycling Games is entering — and it is the most receptive audience in the scheme's history.

2025

3 RBA cuts, brief relief — then reversed

2026

2–3 more hikes forecast — 18-yr high

Source: MacroBusiness / Roy Morgan / NAB Economists — April 2026

Mortgage stress forecast to hit an 18-year high in 2026
Mortgage StressApr 2026

MacroBusiness / Roy Morgan

Mortgage stress forecast to hit an 18-year high in 2026

Interest rate futures markets have priced a cash rate of 4.75% by end of 2026. Roy Morgan warns 30.9% of mortgage holders would be 'at risk' if the RBA delivers two more hikes — the highest level since the GFC.

Read source →
Households brace for cost-of-living shock as conflict drives up prices
Cost of LivingApr 2026

Australian Financial Review

Households brace for cost-of-living shock as conflict drives up prices

NAB economists forecast real household income per person to fall 0.7% in H1 2026, as higher fuel costs and associated price rises eat away at incomes — potentially the weakest GDP growth since the early 1990s.

Read source →
Living costs rise for ALL household types — up to 4.2% for age pensioners
ABS DataFeb 2026

ABS — Official Statistics

Living costs rise for ALL household types — up to 4.2% for age pensioners

The ABS confirmed in February 2026 that living costs rose across every household type in the December 2025 quarter, ranging from 2.3% to 4.2% — with pensioners and government transfer recipients hardest hit.

Read source →
58% of renters faced rent increases — 37% sacrificing meals to survive
Rental Crisis2024 baseline

The Salvation Army

58% of renters faced rent increases — 37% sacrificing meals to survive

The Salvation Army's cost of living report documents 58 per cent of renters reporting rent increases. More than 37 per cent of Australians are now sacrificing meals — a baseline that continues to worsen.

Read source →
70% of Australians now facing housing stress
Housing Stress2026

Yahoo Finance / ABS

70% of Australians now facing housing stress

Since mid-2022, compounding rent and mortgage increases have pushed 70 per cent of Australians into some form of housing stress — a figure that continues to worsen as 2026 rate hike forecasts bite.

Read source →
Housing unaffordability at record levels — 'anything above 30% is stress'
Record UnaffordabilityFeb 2026

WSWS / Housing Data

Housing unaffordability at record levels — 'anything above 30% is stress'

As of March 2026, housing affordability stood at 29.6% of income — above the 30% stress threshold. With further rate hikes forecast, analysts warn recent first-home buyers face negative equity.

Read source →

What This Means for a Typical Australian Household

Mortgage repayments

18-yr high forecast — 30.9% of holders at risk

Grocery & food bills

Living costs up 2.3–4.2% in Dec 2025 qtr

Housing stress

70% of Australians facing housing stress now

Real household income

Falling 0.7% in H1 2026 — NAB/AFR

The compounding effect of years of rising costs — now worsening again in 2026 — means every legitimate earning or saving opportunity is no longer a "nice to have" — it's a lifeline. This is the environment Australian households are living in right now.

Section 2 — The Psychology

Why Financial Pressure Makes Our Model More Powerful

This isn't intuition — it's documented behavioural science. When people feel financially squeezed, their sensitivity to incentives increases, their attention to financial opportunities sharpens, and their willingness to change behaviour rises dramatically.

Variable Reward = Maximum Engagement

4× moreparticipation than fixed rewards

UBC research on deposit-refund systems confirms lottery-style variable rewards dramatically outperform fixed refund models. The dopamine pathway activated by uncertain rewards is the same mechanism exploited by Lotto — except recycling costs nothing to enter.

UBC Psychology — Lottery Recycling Research, 2025

Financial Hardship Amplifies Incentive Sensitivity

2× moreresponsive to rewards under financial stress

UCSD research ('When and Why Incentives Work') shows that financial pressure heightens sensitivity to incentive-driven behaviour. People under economic duress scan for financial opportunities with greater intensity — a phenomenon called 'scarcity mindset' (Mullainathan & Shafir, Harvard).

Gneezy & List, UCSD — JEP Incentives Research; Mullainathan & Shafir, 'Scarcity', Harvard

Prize Pools Create Social Contagion

$250K+prize pool triggers word-of-mouth at scale

Large prize pools create water-cooler moments. When the potential upside is significant, people tell friends, share on social media, and recruit family members. The Anthropocene Magazine review (2025) confirmed bottle lotteries 'could transform recycling' at no extra cost to operators.

Anthropocene Magazine — 'Treating empty bottles like lottery tickets', 2025

Community Competition Drives Sustained Action

Team playextends participation by months, not days

Research on gamified behaviour change shows team-based competition creates accountability structures that sustain participation far beyond one-off incentives. When your team's score depends on your recycling, missing a week has social consequences.

Winkler, Schor & Brauer (2024) — 'Fostering Long-Term Effectiveness of Financial Incentive Programs', UW–Madison

The "Scarcity Mindset" — Harvard Research

Mullainathan & Shafir's landmark Harvard research "Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much" demonstrated that financial scarcity causes the brain to hyper-focus on financial opportunities. Decisions that are normally ignored become compelling.

This is not a flaw — it's a feature. A household that previously couldn't be bothered returning 20 bottles now thinks about it because every dollar matters. The crisis is our recruitment engine.

Read: When and Why Incentives Work — UCSD
Pre-crisis: recycling seen as inconvenient
During crisis: $2 return trip = worth it
With prize pool: $2 + chance at $250K = compelling
With teams: social pressure + financial reward = unstoppable
Section 3 — Why Other CDS Strategies Fail

No Other Strategy Changes Behaviour at This Moment

The following analysis is drawn entirely from published research, government data, and scheme operator reports — not opinion. Each conventional CDS strategy is assessed against the evidence.

FAILS

Awareness Campaigns

Awareness is near-saturated. More education campaigns cannot change behaviour that is blocked by inconvenience, not ignorance.

EPA SA's 2023 National CDS Behaviour Change Research found that awareness of CDS schemes is already high (80%+), yet participation remains stagnant. The knowledge-action gap is well established in environmental psychology — knowing what to do and doing it are not the same.

Source: EPA SA National CDS Behaviour Change Research, March 2023
FAILS

Infrastructure Expansion (More RVMs)

The bottleneck is motivation, not proximity. People pass return points daily and don't stop. Building more doesn't change the calculus.

WA's WARRRL operates 303 return points. NSW has 1,000+ return locations. Despite dense infrastructure, national return rates plateau around 52–62%. Infrastructure access is not the binding constraint.

Source: WARRRL Annual Report; TOMRA Cleanaway NSW data
FAILS

Charity / Donation Partnerships

Altruism is a luxury. People in survival mode prioritise self-interest. The ask collides directly with household financial pressure.

During a cost-of-living crisis, altruism shrinks. Research consistently shows charitable giving declines when household finances tighten. Asking people to donate their 10c refund when they're struggling to pay rent is a misread of the moment.

Source: Behavioural Economics research: 'Charity fatigue and financial stress' — UBC; ABS Household Expenditure Survey
INSUFFICIENT

Doubling the Refund to 20c

A 10c vs 20c difference is a marginal financial tweak. Neither amount creates urgency, anticipation, or sustained behaviour change on its own.

Price elasticity evidence supports that higher refunds do improve participation marginally — but 20c per container is still a transactional micro-payment. For a family with 50 containers, the difference is $5 vs $10. Neither amount creates a compelling behavioural reason to act consistently. The 10c Recycling Games doesn't touch the refund value at all — it changes what happens to it, creating an entirely different psychological response.

Source: Making Cents: Economic Analysis of Container Deposit Schemes — Australian Beverages Council
FAILS

Social Norm Messaging

When survival instincts dominate, social norms lose their force. People optimise for personal gain, not peer approval.

Social norm campaigns (e.g. 'Most Australians recycle their containers') show modest short-term shifts in attitudes but minimal long-term behaviour change. The HILDA Survey shows household financial pressure now overrides social norm compliance in consumption decisions.

Source: HILDA Survey 2024 Statistical Report, Melbourne Institute; EPA SA CDS Research 2023

Strategy Effectiveness Matrix

Based on published research and scheme performance data

StrategyAwareness ↑Behaviour ↑Works in CrisisSustained
Awareness Campaigns✅❌❌❌
More Infrastructure—⚠️❌⚠️
Charity Partnerships✅❌❌❌
20c Refund—⚠️⚠️⚠️
Social Norm Messaging✅⚠️❌❌
10c Recycling Games✅✅✅✅
Section 4 — Who, How Many, & Why They'll Participate

Up to 15 Million Australians Have Clear Reason to Participate

Not every Australian will participate — but a conservative reading of overlapping financial stress data shows the addressable market is substantial and growing. Here's who they are and why they'll act.

Target Population Breakdown

~15 Million Australians
Have Clear Reason to Participate

A conservative estimate of overlapping financial stress segments puts the addressable market at up to 15 million Australians. These are people already under measurable financial pressure — the exact conditions that behavioural science tells us make incentive-based participation compelling. Here's who they are, why they'll act, and why they'll recruit others.

~15M

Conservative addressable market

Overlapping stressed segments

5.8M

Actively seeking income

Highest participation likelihood

1.3M

In housing stress

Immediate action needed

Six Overlapping Groups Ready to Act

These groups have different triggers, but they share one thing: measurable financial pressure and active income-seeking behaviour. Click each to see the source data.

Why These Groups Overlap & Amplify

The 5.8M Actively Seeking Income

These are the primary participants. They're already hustling — gig work, side jobs, casual shifts. Adding recycling + prize pool is a no-friction addition to their existing behaviour. They recruit friends because 'it's easy money.'

The 9.1M Under Financial Stress

This is the wider funnel. Not all are actively seeking income YET — but 34.6% are under psychological pressure. As the Games gain visibility and social proof builds, this group converts to participants.

The 1.3M in Housing Stress

This is the urgency trigger. Households choosing between mortgage/rent payments and food. Every return = direct money for necessities. Participation rates here approach 100% once awareness is achieved.

The 82% in Stressed Electorates

This creates geographic clustering and social contagion. When a neighbourhood has majority financial stress, the Game isn't a curiosity — it's a survival strategy. Participation spreads through social networks at exponential rates.

Section 1 — Historical Precedent

Crisis Participation is Documented Fact

This isn't speculation. History shows that when financial pressure rises, participation in hope-based and income-seeking activities increases dramatically.

1

2008 Financial Crisis

Lottery ticket sales surged as joblessness peaked. Participation increased especially among lower-income households.

During recessions, hope-based incentives (lottery) attract those with limited other options.

📊 Source: Wayne State University Lottery Research

2

2020 COVID-19 Pandemic

Gig economy participation in Australia jumped dramatically as traditional employment collapsed. 56% of working-age Australians reported gig work income.

When primary income streams dry up, people actively seek alternative income sources — including ones with variable rewards.

📊 Source: Monash University Study, 2024

3

2023–2025 RBA Rate Hikes

Lottery ticket sales (US: $104.7B in 2024, up from $52.8B in 2008) continue climbing. Australian equivalent shows same trend.

Income-seeking behaviour accelerates proportionally with financial pressure. The 10c Games is a 'productive lottery' — you recycle, you win.

📊 Source: US Census Bureau Analysis; Australian Lottery Commission

Section 2 — Why They'll Participate

Four Psychological Mechanics Driving Participation

Beyond raw numbers, behavioural psychology explains WHY people in financial stress are hyper-responsive to games like this.

1

Scarcity Mindset Activation

Indicator

34.6% in financial stress

Mechanism

Financial pressure narrows focus to immediate opportunities with tangible payoffs

Outcome

People who would normally ignore a 10c return NOW track and plan for it

2

Hope as Primary Currency

Indicator

Lottery sales up 98% (2008–2024)

Mechanism

When economic outlook is bleak, the possibility of a big win becomes a mental escape hatch

Outcome

Prize pool creates dopamine spike without significant cost to participant

3

Gig Economy Normalisation

Indicator

56% of Australians do gig work

Mechanism

People are now conditioned to 'hustle' for extra income. Informal work is normalized.

Outcome

Recycling + prize entry fits the 'side hustle' mental model they already live

4

Survival-Mode Behaviour

Indicator

1.3M in housing stress; 3.3M in poverty

Mechanism

Survival mode triggers active income-seeking behaviour — the brain scans for money-making opportunities

Outcome

Every $2 return + prize ticket has measurable utility. Participation becomes rational self-interest.

Critical Insights

Conservative Estimate

A realistic target of 5–8M active participants sits well within the 15M addressable market. Even 5M consistent recyclers would represent a transformational shift in national return rates.

Recruitment Multiplier

Each participant recruits 1.5–2 others through peer effects. At 5M initial participants, that's 7.5–10M total within 18 months — still well within the 15M ceiling.

Zero-Cost Infrastructure

We don't need new depots. We use existing CDS infrastructure. The prize pool is the only new cost — and it's paid for by engagement.

The Moment is Now

Financial stress peaked in early 2024 and remains elevated. The window of maximum receptivity is THIS MOMENT, not next year.

Geographic Advantage

82% of electorates have majority financial stress. This means geographic clustering makes word-of-mouth and social proof exponentially more effective.

Section 5 — Why the Games Works

Current CDS Schemes Fail
Because They're Missing the Hook

The 65–75% plateau that every mature CDS hits is not a logistics problem. It is a behaviour design problem. The 10c refund is not a compelling enough incentive to change behaviour. The 10c Recycling Games solves this by applying proven behavioural science mechanics — variable rewards, immediate feedback, and social proof — on top of existing infrastructure. No new machines. No new legislation. Just better behaviour design.

The Timing Window

When 34.6% of the population is under financial stress, a meaningful prize pool backed by behaviour science isn't a gimmick — it's a genuine incentive that changes behaviour. This crisis moment won't last forever. The window is now.

Behaviour Science, Not Guilt

The 10c refund alone cannot compete with inertia. But variable-reward schedules, immediate feedback, and social proof are proven to overcome inertia at scale. These are the same mechanics that drive every high-engagement system in the world.

Zero New Infrastructure

The 10c Recycling Games operates as a software layer on existing CDS coordinator systems. No new machines. No new policy. Just behaviour design on top of existing infrastructure. Fast to scale. Low to implement.

Why This Works (And Why Others Don't)

Fixed 10c refunds = predictable, boring. Variable-ratio prize entries = compelling, repeatable behaviour change.
Awareness campaigns teach WHAT to do. Prize mechanics teach people WHY to do it — and create the incentive to do it repeatedly.
The refund value is unchanged. What changes is the DESIGN of what happens after — instant points, draws, instant wins, social leaderboards.
Every return generates real points → Every point spent on draws or instant wins → Every draw creates anticipation for the next return. This is a closed loop, not a campaign.
At scale, the system self-funds: container returns → 10c flows to Gamified Technologies → 80% to prize pool → participants earn prizes → participation grows → more containers → more prizes.
Current schemes plateau because they rely on rational decision-making. We succeed because we bypass rationality and target the brain's reward system directly.

All Sources & References

The 10c Recycling Games
Return for a Cause

Important Legal Disclaimer

Please read and acknowledge these terms before continuing.